61. New light on dancing bees…

Thanks to the pioneering work of Karl von Frisch, we have long known that honey bees returning to the hive can communicate both the distance and the direction of a food source to their hive-mates.

They achieve this astonishing feat by means of a curious ‘waggle dance’ they perform on the vertical surface of the hive - in complete darkness. To make sense of the dance, the ‘followers’ need to be able to do two things. They must keep track of the orientation of the ‘dancer’ relative to the vertical force of gravity (this supplies the course or vector that leads to the food source, relative to the sun’s position in the sky) and also monitor the duration of the dance (which supplies the distance the bee will have to travel to the food source).

For a long time researchers have wondered how the ‘followers’ - who surround the ‘dancer’ on all sides - can possibly keep track of the complicated patterns of the dance.

Ingenious new research by Anna Hadjitofi and Barbara Webb suggests a possible answer.

High speed video recordings reveal that the ‘followers’ adjust the angles of their antennae depending on where they stand in relation to the ‘dancer’.

In principle, if the ‘followers’ knew their own body angle relative to the ‘dancer’ (as encoded in the position of their antennae) and combined that with their heading relative to the vertical force of gravity, they could work out where the food source lies.

Hadjitofi and Webb have shown that navigational circuitry of just the kind employed by fruit flies would enable honey bees to perform all the necessary computations. (The details are a bit complicated - for a full explanation, follow this link to the original research.)

Since honey bees and fruit flies are very likely to share the same navigational circuitry, it is highly probable that Hadjitofi and Webb are onto something really important. But further research will be needed to establish whether they are correct.

60. Butterflies cross an ocean

Research just published shows that migratory Painted Lady butterflies (Vanessa cardui) found on the coast of South America had crossed the Atlantic from West Africa - and might even have started their journeys in Europe. That means they may have travelled - in total - 7000 km or more! Astonishing, even by comparison with the mighty Monarch butterfly, though the Painted Ladies would have been helped on their way by the Trade Winds.

59. The Challenge of Light Pollution

Our abuse of the natural world is causing problems which grow more terrifying with every passing day.  

Understandably, climate change and the physical destruction of entire ecosystems attract the most attention. 

But we face another environmental threat - one which is insidious and fast-growing, yet still widely ignored. 

Light pollution.

The world we inhabit was, until modern times, governed by strict astronomical laws. Day followed night, and the night was always dark - except when the moon was full. This celestial regime shaped the behaviour and biological rhythms of (almost) every living thing on the planet. 

The coming of electric light changed everything - and continues to do so. In many places true darkness now never comes. And while we may welcome that change because some of our deepest fears are associated with darkness, all that new light is causing immense damage. 

There is overwhelming evidence of the destructive effects of artificial light on the animals (and plants) with which we share the planet. 

To give just a few examples, it is likely that billions - yes, billions - of migratory birds die when they are drawn to brightly lit buildings. And even that number is dwarfed by the number of insects that suffer a similar fate. Then there are the countless, doomed turtle hatchlings that are lured away from the sea by artificial light.  

Light pollution is a major but little-noticed factor in the massive problem of biodiversity loss. 

Moreover it is increasingly clear that by banishing darkness we are also damaging our own health and well-being.

Exposure to artificial light at night is associated with a host of physical and mental disorders including diabetes, depression and even some forms of cancer.

And we are suffering other, less tangible but important injuries.

The darkness that once permitted everyone on the planet to see thousands of stars, as well as the glowing ribbon of the Milky Way - our home galaxy - has been obscured by the halo of artificial light that surrounds every town and city. The arrival of the LED has only made matters worse.

Most people living today will never see the night sky in all its glory. 

The facts are not in dispute.  In some countries (France, for example) governments are already taking practical steps to address the problems of light pollution. In the US there are many cities that have taken steps to reduce the glare of outdoor lighting.

But the British government rejected an amendment to the recent Environment Act that would have added the reduction of light pollution as a target. 

Low public awareness is a major obstacle, coupled with the common assumption that more light must be better, and a widely held (but questionable) belief that it always improves our security.  

Few people realise that the worst effects of light pollution can be reduced or eliminated by taking a few simple, inexpensive steps - such as installing lights with warmer colours, shielding them so that they don’t not spill upwards into the sky, and using motion sensors so that they only come on when needed. 

The best solution of all - just turning unnecessary lights off - has the great additional benefit of saving both energy and money.  

Often it is enough to draw someone’s attention to the problems. I recently persuaded the British Army to remove some outrageously bright lights from a military base in the middle of Chichester Harbour (a nature reserve on the South Coast of England) simply by having a conversation with the senior officer in charge. 

In the UK, the Council for the Protection of Rural England’s (CPRE) annual ‘star count’ has helped people become more aware of the problem of ‘skyglow’ - and it’s good news that several Dark Sky Parks have been designated in the UK.  

But while some UK charities take an interest in light pollution, none treats it as a priority. Because all their efforts are small and fragmented, progress in tackling the problem has been painfully slow.

 Much more needs to be done. 

 So here are a few ideas: 

Why don’t British environmental charities devise and adopt a code of conduct in relation to light pollution? 

Why don’t those same charities ask all their grant recipients to follow a similar code of conduct? Perhaps they could offer extra funding for this purpose. 

A good way of raising public awareness in the UK would be to establish an annual prize in recognition of outstanding achievements in tacking light pollution. Who would like to take this on? 

Above all, policy change is needed. Will one of our leading environmental charities launch a campaign to get the government to regulate light pollution? 

Yes, it’s a big challenge, but it’s also an urgent one.  

45. How to make electronic navigation more engaging - and rewarding

Many navigators are worried about the consequences of our increasing reliance on automatic navigation systems - especially the ‘turn-by-turn’ apps based on GPS that are now embedded in every cell phone and every vehicle.

There’s plenty of evidence (which I discuss in Incredible Journeys/Supernavigators) that the passive use of these apps impedes the development of the mental maps that enable us to find our way around most efficiently.

There are even those who think that we may endanger our overall cognitive health by using them too much. And there’s no doubt that these apps impoverish our lives by discouraging us from taking an active interest in the world around us.

But nobody seriously thinks we can turn the clock back. Navigational apps are here to stay because they make life so much easier - and sometimes (though not always) safer.

The question is whether they can be tweaked so as to reduce or eliminate some of their drawbacks.

An interesting new study (Clemenson, G.D., Maselli, A., Fiannaca, A.J. et al. Rethinking GPS navigation: creating cognitive maps through auditory clues. Sci Rep 11, 7764 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87148-4) examines the virtues of a different kind of app - one that does seem to help people develop a better grasp of the layout of their surroundings.

Instead of relying on the usual turn-by-turn directions, some participants in the new study followed a virtual, auditory compass (based on the Soundscape app - originally designed for visually-impaired users) in order to locate various goals dotted around the Microsoft campus. The compass indicated the straight-line route to each goal, and the user then had to navigate actively around any obstacles (like buildings) that stood in the way.

The authors acknowledge that the sample size was small, but they insist that - in contrast to a standard turn-by-turn app - the Soundscape virtual compass helped participants who were new to the campus develop a better sense of its geography.

They argue that “using auditory beacons to navigate can lead to greater explorative behavior and the formation of more accurate mental maps of the surrounding environment when compared to turn-by-turn navigation. Thus, demonstrating that it is possible to use GPS technology and promote learning through active navigation.”

They conclude that an auditory beacon is “a sensory augmentation that helps us create a stronger connection with our environment.”

This is a promising development, and I hope we’ll soon see more research of this kind. But I wonder whether the mass market navigational platforms will take heed of the new findings - and whether users are ready to embrace a more active approach to navigation than they have got used to. We’ll have to wait and see.